RSS

Overload: the biggest problem with digital photography!

31 Oct

Update:
Over 9000 images in main folder… about 3000 to go… time for bed. My brain is mush, and so is my mouse clicking finger.

Update 2: Just the process of consolidating my pix into one folder trimmed the size down from over 12,000 to 11,000! That means that there were over 1000 duplicates scattered around. For example, a certain picture of myself may have had one copy in the “Family” folder, another copy in the “Portraits” folder, another copy in the “Trip to Illinois” folder, etc. I expect further processing to eliminate even more.

Update 3: I came to realize that computers don’t really like thousands of files in one folder. Therefore I compromised by creating one folder per year. This gets it down to no more than around 5000 in any one folder, which reduces the load on whatever mechanism the computer has for creating thumbnails, etc.


Our family has gone through some major transitions during recent years. We have moved from Grand Rapids, Michigan to Flint, Michigan, to Florida; from a comfortable home to 2 years in a hotel, to our present mobile home in Florida. Much of that “progress” has been documented with our Nikon Coolpix 5700, and a few other digital cameras. In fact, in the 6 years or so that I have been taking digital photos, I have amassed over 12,000 pictures on my hard drive. Photos are by far the largest portion of my file space.

I have my KDE screen saver set to slide show mode so that it keeps throwing random images up every 20 seconds. (You can do that when you “keep your nose clean!”) It has been fun to have that constant visual reminder of people and places we love. Often we’ll interrupt whatever we’re doing to comment on some random picture… “Who on earth is that??” “Oh, that’s the janitor at the school where Mary Ann taught…”, etc.

The worst part of having a huge digital collection, as you might guess, is getting it organized for easy access, and keeping it that way. My practice has been to create folders that are named according to content. That was great when there were twenty or thirty folders. But now that there are almost 400 (and in some places several levels of subfolders), there is just no way to quickly find what I’m looking for. What looked to me like a promising “scheme” of file and folder structure at the start, has become very cumbersome and problematic when multiplied to exponential proportions.

Enter KPhotoAlbum, which has been designed by Jesper Pedersen to address this exact problem. His solution? Tagging, rather than “foldering.” With KPhotoAlbum’s tagging, you can find almost any picture (that you have tagged) in a matter of seconds. See Jesper’s video demos here. It really works! It really does make the tagging of photo content an efficient process. It’s still work, mind you, but it is efficient work.

I have been using KPhotoAlbum somewhat hit and miss for several years, and I’m quite sure that it is the solution to my photo problem. The only thing keeping me from making it my only solution is the prospect of tagging thousands of pictures.

Here is my plan: I’m going to kick the legs out from under the table. I’m going to burn the bridges behind me. I’m going to motivate myself to get busy tagging by eliminating the folder structure entirely! I’m going to put ALL the pictures in one folder, so that almost the only way to find anything is to get it tagged! I suspect this will motivate me to get rid of a lot of blurry, unnecessary pictures as well!

“On your marks! Get set! GO!”

Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 31, 2008 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: